(no subject)
Jun. 26th, 2016 09:43 amLong time followers are probably sick of me rehashing this. But it is something I am still trying to work out for myself.
The original version of this post got picked up by sherlockfandomhateswomen and I completely freaked out and deleted the post. But I wish I hadn’t; I wish I had argued back. But that is still a pretty terrifying idea. I like living in my quiet little corner or the internet throwing ideas against the wall to see what sticks.
Part of the problem was that I was sloppy because I felt like I was talking to half a dozen people, but I was potentially talking to the whole internet. Which is something I am still very uncomfortable with about Tumblr and Twitter. (Jon Ronson’s So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed really clarified a lot of things for me about the terror of going viral.)
But I also wonder if the thing I was trying to say – that stereotyping, bad writing, and toxic tropes that grate on me when they’re about women don’t bother me so much when they’re about men – is actually misogynistic.
Post-S3, there has been a huge debate about Mary and why she isn’t allowed to be a complex character or maybe even an appealing villain like Moriarty.
And I feel like the difference is that Mary is actually well written (though I do wish they had let Amanda Abbington know about the character arc during episodes 1 and 2. They certainly didn’t do that with Richard Brook and Moriarty).
I also think it’s really interesting to think about what happens when you cis-swap a character. What kind of back story do you have to create to make the cis-swapped character make sense? And with Irene, when you cis-swap her she becomes less titillating, and more clearly a sexual predator.